Farm Subsidy information
Freeborn County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 221 to 240 of 3,637
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $582,647,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
221 | Randy Gene Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $581,068 |
222 | Bernard Bias | Alden, MN 56009 | $580,140 |
223 | Newry Farms Inc | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $580,064 |
224 | Elvin Steensma | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $580,058 |
225 | David Claussen | Glenville, MN 56036 | $579,067 |
226 | Lynn Davis | Glenville, MN 56036 | $573,635 |
227 | Aaron Cech | Glenville, MN 56036 | $567,359 |
228 | Ardell M Swenson | Austin, MN 55912 | $565,946 |
229 | Deb Enterprises | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $562,787 |
230 | Wayne Wacholz | Hayward, MN 56043 | $562,020 |
231 | Keith Stephen Kuiters | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $559,759 |
232 | L.d.m. Of New Richland, Inc. | New Richland, MN 56072 | $559,475 |
233 | Harold Mehus | Glenville, MN 56036 | $558,484 |
234 | Nancy Heideman | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $557,273 |
235 | Bert Rietsema | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $555,636 |
236 | Brent D Buchanan | Glenville, MN 56036 | $544,958 |
237 | Martin Dylla | Wells, MN 56097 | $543,533 |
238 | Gary L Buchanan | Glenville, MN 56036 | $540,655 |
239 | Paul Rognes | Glenville, MN 56036 | $539,890 |
240 | John Greibrok | Saint Ansgar, IA 50472 | $535,993 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”