Market Loss Assistance Program in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,226
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $26,082,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Paul Ferley | Northwood, IA 50459 | $76,598 |
62 | Dennis James Sorensen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $76,216 |
63 | Dean H Westrum | Glenville, MN 56036 | $76,074 |
64 | David A Hemingway | Ellendale, MN 56026 | $75,998 |
65 | Kenneth And Cindy Lamping Trust | Glenville, MN 56036 | $75,800 |
66 | Peter D Louters | Hollandale, MN 56045 | $75,798 |
67 | Robert A Nelson | Alden, MN 56009 | $75,513 |
68 | Franklin Gjersvik | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $75,502 |
69 | Theron Gjersvik | Alden, MN 56009 | $75,502 |
70 | Steven E Sorensen | Alden, MN 56009 | $74,974 |
71 | Allan Ravenhorst | Hollandale, MN 56045 | $74,693 |
72 | Ridge Till Management Inc | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $72,814 |
73 | Arden Wangen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $72,328 |
74 | David Greibrok | Lyle, MN 55953 | $72,193 |
75 | Glen Jensen | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $71,627 |
76 | Nathan Sylvester Magnuson | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $71,182 |
77 | Steven Thrond | Walters, MN 56097 | $70,638 |
78 | David G Petersen | Alden, MN 56009 | $70,416 |
79 | Faye Madson | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $70,385 |
80 | Dann Phillips | Hartland, MN 56042 | $69,740 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”