Total Conservation Programs in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 639
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $3,115,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Larry Wangen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $13,007 |
62 | David Prantner | Austin, MN 55912 | $12,935 |
63 | Karen Davison | Glenville, MN 56036 | $12,724 |
64 | , | $12,635 | |
65 | Randy P Heimer | Austin, MN 55912 | $12,622 |
66 | Mark Rauenhorst | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $12,507 |
67 | Karl A Youngberg Trust | Waseca, MN 56093 | $12,458 |
68 | Robert Quinn | Glenville, MN 56036 | $12,426 |
69 | Virgil Schewe | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $12,349 |
70 | Henry Oldenkamp | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $12,248 |
71 | John G Rosheim | Austin, MN 55912 | $12,193 |
72 | Debbie A Thunstedt | Alden, MN 56009 | $12,193 |
73 | Lois A Ziebell | Glenville, MN 56036 | $11,757 |
74 | Wayne Ulrich | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $11,607 |
75 | Alma Schadegg Properties LLC | Sunfish Lake, MN 55118 | $11,496 |
76 | Charles Steven Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $11,490 |
77 | Randy Gene Hagen | New Richland, MN 56072 | $11,490 |
78 | Bruce Palmer | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $11,410 |
79 | Chris Anton Peterson | Hartland, MN 56042 | $11,229 |
80 | Rodney Holecek | Glenville, MN 56036 | $11,150 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”