Conservation Reserve Program in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 639
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $3,115,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Palmer Peterson | Twin Lakes, MN 56089 | $10,664 |
82 | Rodger Hill | Ellendale, MN 56026 | $10,601 |
83 | Todd Leach | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $10,443 |
84 | Michael Bjorklund | Hayward, MN 56043 | $10,352 |
85 | Ken Cafourek | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $10,159 |
86 | Barbara D Bryson | Valdez, AK 99686 | $10,000 |
87 | James R Yanke | Dodge Center, MN 55927 | $9,937 |
88 | Allen Mc Gill | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $9,719 |
89 | Harry Nyenhuis | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $9,710 |
90 | Elaine Pacovsky | Marshalltown, IA 50158 | $9,681 |
91 | Robert And Barbara Nathanson Living Trust Dated De | West Des Moines, IA 50265 | $9,681 |
92 | Allan Brown | Hollandale, MN 56045 | $9,493 |
93 | Roxann M Brue | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $9,454 |
94 | S & S Farms Of Pickeral Lake Twp | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $9,384 |
95 | Larry E Reynen | Hayward, WI 54843 | $9,344 |
96 | R Randy Sorensen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $9,252 |
97 | , | $9,247 | |
98 | Jerold L Jensen | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $8,896 |
99 | Kenneth And Cindy Lamping Trust | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $8,731 |
100 | Beatrice J Spieker | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $8,581 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”