Loan Deficiency in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,232
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $49,984,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Curtis O Gniffke | Austin, MN 55912 | $146,796 |
82 | Paul Robertson Heers Jr | Oakland, MN 56007 | $146,363 |
83 | Nordean Krueger | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $145,529 |
84 | Scott Thompson | Austin, MN 55912 | $144,982 |
85 | Theodore L Hinrichs | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $142,849 |
86 | John K Nielsen | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $142,410 |
87 | D A Nelson | Glenville, MN 56036 | $142,113 |
88 | Franklin Gjersvik | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $141,797 |
89 | Ricky D Krueger | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $139,784 |
90 | Robert W Knutson | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $138,999 |
91 | Kuethe Farm Acct C/o Ron Kuethe | Alden, MN 56009 | $138,751 |
92 | William J Lyle | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $138,290 |
93 | Aloysius Bias | Wells, MN 56097 | $137,337 |
94 | Michael D Jensen | Alden, MN 56009 | $137,253 |
95 | Theron Gjersvik | Alden, MN 56009 | $136,780 |
96 | Daniel L Park | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $136,239 |
97 | Steven Ladlie | Hollandale, MN 56045 | $135,374 |
98 | Bruce Ness | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $135,079 |
99 | Steven J Bakken | Hartland, MN 56042 | $134,928 |
100 | Lowell Schuhmacher | Glenville, MN 56036 | $133,865 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”