Market Loss Assistance Program in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,226
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $26,082,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Donn Riskedahl | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $69,508 |
82 | Robert W Knutson | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $69,242 |
83 | Beverly O'connor | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $68,422 |
84 | Curtis Larson Jr | Hayward, MN 56043 | $68,126 |
85 | Thomas Fredrick Lorenzen | Glenville, MN 56036 | $68,050 |
86 | J L Miller | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $67,930 |
87 | Donald Chapek | Austin, MN 55912 | $67,736 |
88 | Dean Knutson | Hartland, MN 56042 | $67,324 |
89 | William J Lyle | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $67,188 |
90 | Ryan Scott Phillips | Hartland, MN 56042 | $66,249 |
91 | Robert Beck | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $66,216 |
92 | Derek Brown | Hollandale, MN 56045 | $66,044 |
93 | Jacobs Dairy Farm | Alden, MN 56009 | $65,915 |
94 | Harlan Wacholz | Alden, MN 56009 | $65,670 |
95 | Bruce Ness | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $65,490 |
96 | Theodore R Hellie | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $65,364 |
97 | Keith Stephen Kuiters | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $65,356 |
98 | Erickson Brothers | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $64,774 |
99 | Mikal Gooden | Emmons, MN 56029 | $64,420 |
100 | Ricky D Krueger | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $64,228 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”