Market Loss Assistance Program in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,226
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $26,082,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Veryl Reed & Sons | Hollandale, MN 56045 | $54,065 |
142 | Bradley Nelson | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $53,903 |
143 | James Benesh Jr | Austin, MN 55912 | $53,824 |
144 | Daniel L Park | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $53,736 |
145 | Calvin Louis Belshan | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $53,727 |
146 | Wayne T Fett | Glenville, MN 56036 | $53,355 |
147 | Marvin H Thompson | Glenville, MN 56036 | $53,112 |
148 | Jack M Allison Trust | Glenville, MN 56036 | $53,023 |
149 | Leslie Ackland | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $52,869 |
150 | Paul Robertson Heers | Austin, MN 55912 | $52,853 |
151 | James M Nelson | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $52,153 |
152 | James Korman | Wells, MN 56097 | $51,871 |
153 | Ronnie Bartness | Hartland, MN 56042 | $51,790 |
154 | Dale Manfred Christopherson | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $51,696 |
155 | Gregory Smith | Alden, MN 56009 | $51,424 |
156 | Jerry Hemingway | Geneva, MN 56035 | $51,159 |
157 | Timothy Peterson | Alden, MN 56009 | $51,034 |
158 | Ronald Stadheim | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $51,020 |
159 | Michael Langfald | Emmons, MN 56029 | $50,933 |
160 | Wesley Tennis | Hayward, MN 56043 | $50,781 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”