Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 998
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $38,019,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | John Michael Schultz | Wells, MN 56097 | $76,354 |
162 | Matthew Kermes | Hayward, MN 56043 | $75,825 |
163 | Dennis Koziolek | Wells, MN 56097 | $75,687 |
164 | Terry E Thorson | Glenville, MN 56036 | $75,522 |
165 | Kuiters Farms LLC | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $74,892 |
166 | Wesley Tennis | Hayward, MN 56043 | $74,862 |
167 | James Benesh Jr | Austin, MN 55912 | $74,811 |
168 | Leslie O Ash | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $74,786 |
169 | Thomas W Butler | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $74,169 |
170 | Perry Jon Erickson | Emmons, MN 56029 | $73,970 |
171 | Bruce A Hansen | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $73,891 |
172 | David A Hemingway | Ellendale, MN 56026 | $73,789 |
173 | Miller Farms Limited Partnership | Oakland, MN 56007 | $73,269 |
174 | Robert Beck | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $73,246 |
175 | John W Angell | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $72,326 |
176 | Lowell Schuhmacher | Glenville, MN 56036 | $72,110 |
177 | Joshua R Raimann | Wells, MN 56097 | $71,947 |
178 | David Solland | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $71,945 |
179 | Glenn Ausen | Hartland, MN 56042 | $71,728 |
180 | Susan Heideman | Glenville, MN 56036 | $71,657 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”