Farm Subsidy information
Freeborn County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 3,637
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $582,647,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Lee Acres Inc | Austin, MN 55912 | $659,240 |
182 | Patrick Alan Staloch | Otsego, MN 55330 | $657,406 |
183 | Roger Broitzman | Glenville, MN 56036 | $652,615 |
184 | Dennis Koziolek | Wells, MN 56097 | $651,649 |
185 | David G Johnson | Glenville, MN 56036 | $646,104 |
186 | Jon Ignaszewski | Wells, MN 56097 | $643,621 |
187 | Bruce Epland | Emmons, MN 56029 | $643,460 |
188 | Matthew Kermes | Hayward, MN 56043 | $643,122 |
189 | T & T Farms Of Alden, Inc. | Alden, MN 56009 | $641,537 |
190 | Bradley Bjerke | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $638,249 |
191 | Duane Epland | Twin Lakes, MN 56089 | $635,533 |
192 | Leslie O Ash | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $634,370 |
193 | Robert Korman | Alden, MN 56009 | $632,984 |
194 | Brian Solberg | Hartland, MN 56042 | $632,164 |
195 | Timothy Korman | Alden, MN 56009 | $629,382 |
196 | Aloysius Bias | Wells, MN 56097 | $628,614 |
197 | Calvin Louis Belshan | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $628,514 |
198 | Jon E Larson | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $622,499 |
199 | Jeffrey Zeller | Alden, MN 56009 | $620,159 |
200 | Richard Allen Reeder | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $618,563 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”