Conservation Reserve Program in Goodhue County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 349
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Goodhue County, Minnesota totaled $918,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Darin A Schuster | Nerstrand, MN 55053 | $4,461 |
62 | Micah Joseph Carl Huneke | Goodhue, MN 55027 | $4,319 |
63 | James Stiehl | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $4,264 |
64 | Raymond J Lopresto | Dennison, MN 55018 | $4,217 |
65 | Robert Bergeson | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $4,202 |
66 | Duane - Tiede Revocable Trust Tiede | Naperville, IL 60540 | $4,200 |
67 | James W Miller | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $4,197 |
68 | Taylor A Waugh | Goodhue, MN 55027 | $4,186 |
69 | Russell Foss | Kenyon, MN 55946 | $4,138 |
70 | Flying J Family Farm LLC | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $4,081 |
71 | Charles L Grabow | Red Wing, MN 55066 | $3,998 |
72 | Nathan P Eimers | Minneapolis, MN 55410 | $3,799 |
73 | Gita J Ghei | Saint Paul, MN 55103 | $3,777 |
74 | Robert Scott Banks | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $3,760 |
75 | Carlson Bros | Welch, MN 55089 | $3,668 |
76 | Leroy Gjemse | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $3,655 |
77 | Mark Belisle | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $3,654 |
78 | Leroy S Schliep | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $3,647 |
79 | Bradley D Olson | Welch, MN 55089 | $3,613 |
80 | Pflaum Doug Mp Pension Plan | Lake City, MN 55041 | $3,528 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”