Conservation Reserve Program in Goodhue County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,337
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Goodhue County, Minnesota totaled $27,272,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Charles Voxland | Marcell, MN 56657 | $57,534 |
122 | Edward G Anderson | Zumbrota, MN 55992 | $57,408 |
123 | Stanley Bargsten | Lake City, MN 55041 | $57,176 |
124 | Lyle Tomforde | Frontenac, MN 55026 | $56,562 |
125 | Rick L Janka | Lake City, MN 55041 | $55,779 |
126 | Wayne Lystrom | Farmington, MN 55024 | $54,696 |
127 | Otterness Trust Edward & Edith | Red Wing, MN 55066 | $54,161 |
128 | Anthony Swenson | Zumbrota, MN 55992 | $54,085 |
129 | Jon Heitman | Lake City, MN 55041 | $53,440 |
130 | Richard Tittle | Red Wing, MN 55066 | $52,637 |
131 | Birdeen H Thoreson | Wanamingo, MN 55983 | $52,623 |
132 | Paul Baughman | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $52,271 |
133 | Mark Belisle | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $51,567 |
134 | Alden - Mccutchan Re T Mccutchan | Claremont, NH 03743 | $51,529 |
135 | Mark Heiman | Northfield, MN 55057 | $51,235 |
136 | Herbert J Johnson | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $51,078 |
137 | Robert C Lindell | Pequot Lakes, MN 56472 | $50,912 |
138 | Joseph Tousignant | Kenyon, MN 55946 | $50,828 |
139 | Daniel R Wildes | Emery, SD 57332 | $50,521 |
140 | Nora Avery | Red Wing, MN 55066 | $50,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”