Total Conservation Programs in Goodhue County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 350
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Goodhue County, Minnesota totaled $919,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kristin Henak | Edina, MN 55435 | $8,011 |
22 | Wade W Shelstad | Red Wing, MN 55066 | $7,877 |
23 | Norman E Miller | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $7,772 |
24 | Lane Mueller | Elk River, MN 55330 | $7,656 |
25 | Anthony Swenson | Zumbrota, MN 55992 | $7,552 |
26 | Douglas - Dankers Revocable Trust Dankers | Red Wing, MN 55066 | $7,325 |
27 | Patrick C Tullo | Welch, MN 55089 | $7,130 |
28 | Marianne Derr | Kenyon, MN 55946 | $7,114 |
29 | Lenus-feuling & M Lavonne Feuling Rlt Feuling | Kenyon, MN 55946 | $7,054 |
30 | Frederick Halvorson | Wanamingo, MN 55983 | $7,038 |
31 | James Notebaart | Red Wing, MN 55066 | $6,993 |
32 | Gary J Esterby | Dennison, MN 55018 | $6,871 |
33 | William H Hollar | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $6,718 |
34 | Jacob Diercks | Goodhue, MN 55027 | $6,637 |
35 | Jared Zillgitt | Zumbrota, MN 55992 | $6,459 |
36 | Jared L Peterson | Zumbrota, MN 55992 | $6,442 |
37 | Duane Lindstrom | Red Wing, MN 55066 | $6,052 |
38 | Craig - Ritter Revoc Trust Agreement Ritter | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $5,926 |
39 | Callstrom Sisters Partnership | Goodhue, MN 55027 | $5,863 |
40 | Charles Zervas | Welch, MN 55089 | $5,780 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”