Farm Subsidy information
Grant County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Grant County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,267
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grant County, Minnesota totaled $437,457,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Brutlag Farms Partnership | Wendell, MN 56590 | $4,857,827 |
2 | Vipond Farms | Norcross, MN 56274 | $4,067,623 |
3 | Vipond Grain Farms | Norcross, MN 56274 | $3,625,738 |
4 | Peterson Farms | Wendell, MN 56590 | $3,030,034 |
5 | Jody Coleman | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $2,905,849 |
6 | Lacey Ridge Farm Company | Wendell, MN 56590 | $2,323,171 |
7 | Mark Severance | Herman, MN 56248 | $2,238,392 |
8 | Robert Ehlers Inc | Barrett, MN 56311 | $2,230,153 |
9 | Lowell Ricks | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $2,220,396 |
10 | S B Swenson Inc | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $2,219,240 |
11 | Todd Ronhovde | Barrett, MN 56311 | $1,964,849 |
12 | Scott Tyberg | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $1,943,356 |
13 | Jack Lacey Co | Wendell, MN 56590 | $1,902,658 |
14 | Sheila Ronhovde | Barrett, MN 56311 | $1,882,010 |
15 | Dale Blume | Norcross, MN 56274 | $1,832,732 |
16 | Mark A Ehlers Inc | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $1,779,088 |
17 | Dean G Sternhagen | Barrett, MN 56311 | $1,768,242 |
18 | Terry A Giese | Hoffman, MN 56339 | $1,767,167 |
19 | Ryan L Biss | Wendell, MN 56590 | $1,761,400 |
20 | Leisha Coleman | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $1,723,733 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>