Counter Cyclical Program in Houston County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 770
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Houston County, Minnesota totaled $4,929,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Steve And Anna Klug | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $11,502 |
142 | Roger Peterson | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $11,474 |
143 | Francis Gallagher | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $11,428 |
144 | Brian Lee | Houston, MN 55943 | $11,383 |
145 | Alice Deters | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $11,352 |
146 | Russel L Paus | Dorchester, IA 52140 | $11,258 |
147 | Michael Soppa Jr | Peterson, MN 55962 | $11,251 |
148 | Heintz Badger Valley Farm Inactiv | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $11,212 |
149 | Tenus Thorson | Houston, MN 55943 | $10,898 |
150 | Lola Thorson | Houston, MN 55943 | $10,898 |
151 | David A Kinstler | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $10,740 |
152 | Lester R Beckman | Houston, MN 55943 | $10,517 |
153 | Dwayne Johnson | La Crescent, MN 55947 | $10,484 |
154 | Jet Farms LLC | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $10,346 |
155 | Darren Henniges | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $10,287 |
156 | Douglas E Weymiller | New Albin, IA 52160 | $10,270 |
157 | Robert E Ellenz | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $10,175 |
158 | Mikal Sylling | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $10,041 |
159 | Marvin Ehlers | Eitzen, MN 55931 | $9,968 |
160 | Douglas R Ward | Mabel, MN 55954 | $9,767 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”