Farm Subsidy information
Houston County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Houston County, Minnesota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 941
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Houston County, Minnesota totaled $19,736,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Koch Dairy Inc | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $590,604 |
2 | Wiebke Feedlot LLC | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $496,472 |
3 | Houdek Dairy LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $456,472 |
4 | Ingvalson Hilltop Farms Inc | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $407,323 |
5 | Hoscheit Dairy Farms LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $384,998 |
6 | Hendel Farms | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $375,856 |
7 | James C. Holty | Mabel, MN 55954 | $367,704 |
8 | Ronald D Holty | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $367,051 |
9 | Morken Farms LLC | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $355,059 |
10 | Schulte Farms Partnership LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $350,905 |
11 | Birchwood Gap Farm Inc | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $302,266 |
12 | Hammell Dairy Inc | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $288,039 |
13 | Blue View Dairy Farm LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $287,553 |
14 | Dustin Meyer | New Albin, IA 52160 | $247,791 |
15 | Gerard Dairy LLC | Spring Grove, MN 55974 | $246,406 |
16 | Dev-lin Holsteins, LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $230,597 |
17 | Schroeder Bros LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $216,985 |
18 | Heintz Badger Valley Farm LLC | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $215,907 |
19 | Schieber Farm | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $201,951 |
20 | Lester Banse | Caledonia, MN 55921 | $186,482 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>