Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Hubbard County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 62
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Hubbard County, Minnesota totaled $974,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ridgeway Farm | Nevis, MN 56467 | $11,338 |
22 | William J Drury | Akeley, MN 56433 | $10,071 |
23 | James Schauer | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $10,057 |
24 | Gary Hensel | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $8,901 |
25 | Daniel Splittstoesser | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $7,560 |
26 | Corey Lindgren | Cass Lake, MN 56633 | $7,137 |
27 | Sue E Pierce | Laporte, MN 56461 | $7,062 |
28 | Dale Lembke | Cass Lake, MN 56633 | $6,685 |
29 | James Kenneth Dickinson | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $6,542 |
30 | Patrick Lessman | Becida, MN 56678 | $6,415 |
31 | Leo Gartner | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $6,393 |
32 | Jason Michael Sheets | Laporte, MN 56461 | $6,366 |
33 | David C Peckat | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $6,188 |
34 | Gary W Warmbold | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $5,579 |
35 | Dwaine Mccullion | Nevis, MN 56467 | $5,488 |
36 | Gregg Malm | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $4,856 |
37 | Nathan L Pike | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $4,792 |
38 | Joel Rehm | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $4,784 |
39 | Matthew Allen Brown | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $3,989 |
40 | Charles G Malm | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $3,685 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”