Conservation Reserve Program in Hubbard County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 193
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Hubbard County, Minnesota totaled $2,153,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Nicholas R Guetter | Wabasso, MN 56293 | $7,142 |
82 | Roper And Obenland Partnership | Glenwood, MN 56334 | $6,936 |
83 | Dean D Jopp | Mayer, MN 55360 | $6,862 |
84 | Dale Kriens | Backus, MN 56435 | $6,478 |
85 | Arthur Meyer | Nevis, MN 56467 | $6,345 |
86 | Roger Kranz | Gaylord, MN 55334 | $6,204 |
87 | David Peter Burkel | Menahga, MN 56464 | $6,115 |
88 | Howard Chandler | Bemidji, MN 56601 | $6,111 |
89 | Leon Mager | Wyoming, MN 55092 | $6,100 |
90 | Loren Avenson | Nevis, MN 56467 | $5,893 |
91 | Duane Christensen | Bemidji, MN 56601 | $5,780 |
92 | Arlyce N Becker | Sun Lakes, AZ 85248 | $5,661 |
93 | Darrel C Casmey | Nielsville, MN 56568 | $5,517 |
94 | Albert J Gartner | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $5,454 |
95 | Marvin F Koktavy | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $5,452 |
96 | Mark Pyburn | Menahga, MN 56464 | $5,283 |
97 | Kenneth Thole | Laporte, MN 56461 | $4,999 |
98 | Bf Enterprises Inc Pension Plan | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $4,827 |
99 | Gilbert Kath | Maple Valley, WA 98038 | $4,817 |
100 | Luella Oelschlager | Nevis, MN 56467 | $4,806 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”