Total Emergency Relief Program in Hubbard County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 31
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Hubbard County, Minnesota totaled $959,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Alex Bishop | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $431,445 |
2 | Benjamin Organics LLC | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $68,102 |
3 | Brandon Crosley Supalla | Bemidji, MN 56601 | $66,431 |
4 | Dennis C Bolton | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $65,820 |
5 | Becker Farms Of Park Rapids Inc | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $44,729 |
6 | Leroy G Paulson | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $41,553 |
7 | Gregg Malm | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $27,467 |
8 | Donald Hemenway | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $17,651 |
9 | Charles G Malm | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $14,917 |
10 | James Schauer | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $13,991 |
11 | William J Drury | Akeley, MN 56433 | $13,570 |
12 | Maves Farm Inc | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $13,418 |
13 | Leo Gartner | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $12,360 |
14 | Kevin Bliss | Nevis, MN 56467 | $11,927 |
15 | Timothy D Johanning | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $11,417 |
16 | Jeri Johanning | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $11,417 |
17 | Nathan L Pike | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $10,101 |
18 | Charles N Andress | Nevis, MN 56467 | $8,572 |
19 | John Dennis | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $8,447 |
20 | William Henry Mack | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $8,372 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>