Total Emergency Relief Program in Isanti County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 65
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Isanti County, Minnesota totaled $2,135,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jerome W Schmidt | Dalbo, MN 55017 | $11,038 |
42 | John K Swanson | North Branch, MN 55056 | $10,352 |
43 | Sarah Senlycki | Princeton, MN 55371 | $10,329 |
44 | Joshua Gary Wentworth | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $9,500 |
45 | Jeffrey L Engquist | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $8,429 |
46 | Norman L Reinhart | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $8,427 |
47 | Neil Alm | Princeton, MN 55371 | $8,392 |
48 | William V Binger | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $6,919 |
49 | Plowman Farms LLC | Rush City, MN 55069 | $6,602 |
50 | Jerry Jensen | Isanti, MN 55040 | $5,949 |
51 | Paul A Keocher | Mora, MN 55051 | $5,809 |
52 | Joel Keocher | Stacy, MN 55079 | $5,790 |
53 | Darrell Eggert | Milaca, MN 56353 | $5,055 |
54 | Lyle Peterson | Isanti, MN 55040 | $4,985 |
55 | Steve Shimek | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $4,342 |
56 | , | $3,881 | |
57 | Margaret A. Edie | Dalbo, MN 55017 | $3,589 |
58 | Jere L Lundberg | Princeton, MN 55371 | $3,584 |
59 | Bruce Wyatt & Nelson Wyatt Ptr | Bethel, MN 55005 | $2,840 |
60 | James Blomgren | Princeton, MN 55371 | $2,414 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”