Direct Payment Program in Isanti County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 781
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Isanti County, Minnesota totaled $12,719,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | William V Binger III | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $15,481 |
142 | Thomas Johnson | Braham, MN 55006 | $15,309 |
143 | Steven Pass | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $15,200 |
144 | Jerry Jensen | Isanti, MN 55040 | $15,180 |
145 | Eklunds Scattered Acres Llp | Braham, MN 55006 | $15,092 |
146 | Hill/n/dale Inc | Princeton, MN 55371 | $14,962 |
147 | Ralph E Hiller | Zimmerman, MN 55398 | $14,896 |
148 | Bruce Bloomgren | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $14,671 |
149 | Steven Hegg | North Branch, MN 55056 | $14,666 |
150 | Harlan Pearson | Saint Francis, MN 55070 | $14,502 |
151 | Ronald A Wetter | Princeton, MN 55371 | $14,414 |
152 | Greg Oldenkamp | Dalbo, MN 55017 | $14,216 |
153 | Douglas C Springer | Saint Francis, MN 55070 | $14,130 |
154 | David L Collin | Isanti, MN 55040 | $13,973 |
155 | Steven Gilbraith | Isanti, MN 55040 | $13,608 |
156 | John Gerving | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $13,447 |
157 | Martin T Moritz | Elk River, MN 55330 | $13,362 |
158 | Chris Benson | Dalbo, MN 55017 | $13,351 |
159 | Bennie A Meyer | Princeton, MN 55371 | $12,785 |
160 | John Challander | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $12,708 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”