Production Flexibility Program in Isanti County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 691
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Isanti County, Minnesota totaled $8,054,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Otto Hesse | North Branch, MN 55056 | $12,956 |
142 | James Blomgren | Princeton, MN 55371 | $12,932 |
143 | Russell R Hoeft | Princeton, MN 55371 | $12,922 |
144 | Brian E Johnson | Isanti, MN 55040 | $12,464 |
145 | Marlyn Boster | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $11,992 |
146 | George Dirk Claassen | Princeton, MN 55371 | $11,805 |
147 | William T Bradow | Princeton, MN 55371 | $11,641 |
148 | Paul E Hass | Saint Francis, MN 55070 | $11,624 |
149 | Marvin Lindell | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $11,537 |
150 | Roger Bergman | Isanti, MN 55040 | $11,492 |
151 | Larry Lundeen | Isanti, MN 55040 | $11,277 |
152 | Ruth C Stromberg Estate | Dalbo, MN 55017 | $11,247 |
153 | Mick Morrison | Braham, MN 55006 | $11,065 |
154 | Thomas Johnson | Braham, MN 55006 | $11,035 |
155 | Charles Slater | Princeton, MN 55371 | $10,815 |
156 | Patricia Moss-hass | Saint Francis, MN 55070 | $10,757 |
157 | Marjorie A Morgan | North Branch, MN 55056 | $10,745 |
158 | Peter Clay | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $10,720 |
159 | Mark Schmidt | Princeton, MN 55371 | $10,692 |
160 | Arlo Peterson | Isanti, MN 55040 | $10,649 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”