Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Isanti County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 72
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Isanti County, Minnesota totaled $76,072 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roland J Foster | Princeton, MN 55371 | $981 |
22 | David Ramberg | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $933 |
23 | Jeremy Hass | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $920 |
24 | Allen Stifter | Isanti, MN 55040 | $907 |
25 | Paul A Keocher | Mora, MN 55051 | $903 |
26 | Vance Anton Senlycki | Princeton, MN 55371 | $902 |
27 | Engquist Ag LLC | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $878 |
28 | Joel Keocher | Stacy, MN 55079 | $861 |
29 | Richard Patterson | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $815 |
30 | Uriah S. Ziegler | Dalbo, MN 55017 | $776 |
31 | Todd Kruse | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $755 |
32 | Mayerlin Challander | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $662 |
33 | Lyle Peterson | Isanti, MN 55040 | $650 |
34 | Michael Skiba | North Branch, MN 55056 | $642 |
35 | Wesley J Gerdin | Braham, MN 55006 | $638 |
36 | Jami Wilking | Isanti, MN 55040 | $629 |
37 | Walter B Frederickson | North Branch, MN 55056 | $611 |
38 | Dennis Jaloszynski | Cambridge, MN 55008 | $599 |
39 | Margaret A. Edie | Dalbo, MN 55017 | $576 |
40 | Steven Larson | Isanti, MN 55040 | $547 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”