Conservation Reserve Program in Jackson County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 471
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Jackson County, Minnesota totaled $2,122,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Steven D Matasovsky | Jackson, MN 56143 | $7,653 |
82 | Robert H Craven | Saint Paul, MN 55108 | $7,255 |
83 | Saint Paul Heron Lake Gun Club | Mendota Heights, MN 55118 | $7,223 |
84 | Kurt Ahrenstorff | Worthington, MN 56187 | $7,177 |
85 | Gerardine M Albers 1983 Trust - Gerardine M Albers | Windom, MN 56101 | $7,159 |
86 | Nicholas P Von Ohlen | Alpha, MN 56111 | $6,845 |
87 | David Macek | Jackson, MN 56143 | $6,731 |
88 | Mark Macek | Jackson, MN 56143 | $6,731 |
89 | Paul Hintze | Lakefield, MN 56150 | $6,693 |
90 | Lock Step Farm Inc | Lakefield, MN 56150 | $6,660 |
91 | Larry G Miller | Lakefield, MN 56150 | $6,655 |
92 | Nasby Lohre Family Farms LLC | Windom, MN 56101 | $6,655 |
93 | Shane T Sether | Jackson, MN 56143 | $6,637 |
94 | Robert J Svoboda | Jackson, MN 56143 | $6,636 |
95 | Bloemke Family Lp | Buffalo Lake, MN 55314 | $6,520 |
96 | Dennis Daberkow | Lakefield, MN 56150 | $6,469 |
97 | Roger L Hartman | Okabena, MN 56161 | $6,367 |
98 | Bezdicek Heirs | Mason City, IA 50401 | $6,311 |
99 | Milo Holmen | Windom, MN 56101 | $6,163 |
100 | Mark W Behrends | Windom, MN 56101 | $6,132 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”