Market Loss Assistance Program in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 1,235
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota totaled $19,148,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Daniel Arthur Hoffenkamp | Paynesville, MN 56362 | $42,116 |
122 | Mark E Dallmann | Lake Lillian, MN 56253 | $42,052 |
123 | Scott M Tersteeg | Olivia, MN 56277 | $41,639 |
124 | Randy Tersteeg | Olivia, MN 56277 | $41,639 |
125 | Charles Jennings Cunningham | Atwater, MN 56209 | $41,496 |
126 | Jeffrey J Brede | Lake Lillian, MN 56253 | $41,493 |
127 | Jeff Lippert | Blomkest, MN 56216 | $41,144 |
128 | John Poortvliet | Prinsburg, MN 56281 | $41,113 |
129 | Roger Hauge | Sunburg, MN 56289 | $41,108 |
130 | Martin Cunningham | Princeton, MN 55371 | $40,975 |
131 | Barry Lee De Groot | Raymond, MN 56282 | $40,858 |
132 | Thomas Allen Gustafson | Willmar, MN 56201 | $40,700 |
133 | Marlo M Macik | Hector, MN 55342 | $40,614 |
134 | Leroy D Ruud | Lake Lillian, MN 56253 | $40,600 |
135 | David Peterson | Spicer, MN 56288 | $40,570 |
136 | Gerald Peterson | Spicer, MN 56288 | $40,570 |
137 | Gary Lee Youngkrantz | Lake Lillian, MN 56253 | $40,516 |
138 | Dean Arvid Youngkrantz | Lake Lillian, MN 56253 | $40,516 |
139 | Allen Dale Youngkrantz | Lake Lillian, MN 56253 | $40,516 |
140 | Glenn Earl Youngkrantz | Lake Lillian, MN 56253 | $40,516 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”