Farm Subsidy information
Kandiyohi County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 4,334
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota totaled $553,441,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Paul Eugene Lippert | Blomkest, MN 56216 | $585,909 |
162 | Donald I Groth | Kerkhoven, MN 56252 | $585,882 |
163 | Norman C Gjerde | Sunburg, MN 56289 | $581,555 |
164 | Gregory A Muench | Atwater, MN 56209 | $580,285 |
165 | Luce Line Llp | Spicer, MN 56288 | $577,715 |
166 | Stanley L Wubben | Willmar, MN 56201 | $572,019 |
167 | David Buer | Willmar, MN 56201 | $571,176 |
168 | Bradley C Jacobson | Kandiyohi, MN 56251 | $566,211 |
169 | Michael V Schmoll | Lake Lillian, MN 56253 | $561,987 |
170 | Dale M Steffensen | New London, MN 56273 | $559,915 |
171 | Beckman Farms Inc | Pennock, MN 56279 | $556,216 |
172 | Randy Lee Post | Prinsburg, MN 56281 | $554,159 |
173 | Steven J Zondervan | Renville, MN 56284 | $552,523 |
174 | Paul D Hentges | Great Bend, ND 58075 | $552,386 |
175 | Daniel Eugene Groothuis | Willmar, MN 56201 | $551,330 |
176 | David Skare | Brooten, MN 56316 | $550,566 |
177 | Pierce Family Farms | Pennock, MN 56279 | $547,272 |
178 | Calvin Carls | Pennock, MN 56279 | $543,709 |
179 | Andrew W Van Der Bill | Kandiyohi, MN 56251 | $541,823 |
180 | Gerald Gratz | Atwater, MN 56209 | $539,681 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”