Loan Deficiency in Kittson County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 464
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Kittson County, Minnesota totaled $16,404,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Timothy Rynning | Kennedy, MN 56733 | $129,879 |
22 | Pelan Land & Cattle Co | Halma, MN 56729 | $129,746 |
23 | Robert Rynning | Kennedy, MN 56733 | $129,510 |
24 | Rodney Webster Inc | Pembina, ND 58271 | $127,412 |
25 | Lloyd Johnson Farms Inc | Karlstad, MN 56732 | $126,391 |
26 | Dmc Lundberg Farms Ptnshp | Kennedy, MN 56733 | $124,627 |
27 | Robert Lindegard | Hallock, MN 56728 | $124,442 |
28 | Daniel & Rebecca Ingeman Ptnshp | Hallock, MN 56728 | $124,247 |
29 | Gunnarson Farms Inc | Hallock, MN 56728 | $120,678 |
30 | Younggren Farms Inc | Hallock, MN 56728 | $120,600 |
31 | David Lindegard | Hallock, MN 56728 | $119,793 |
32 | Richard Lindegard | Hallock, MN 56728 | $119,771 |
33 | Joel Lindegard | Hallock, MN 56728 | $119,771 |
34 | William Sczepanski | Stephen, MN 56757 | $118,262 |
35 | Larry Younggren & Sons Inc | Hallock, MN 56728 | $116,758 |
36 | Younggren Bros Inc | Hallock, MN 56728 | $116,753 |
37 | D & B Farms Ptnshp | Kennedy, MN 56733 | $114,103 |
38 | James C Wiese Inc | Humboldt, MN 56731 | $110,927 |
39 | William H Sugden Inc | Hallock, MN 56728 | $108,683 |
40 | Kurt Kraulik | Kennedy, MN 56733 | $107,235 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”