Total Conservation Programs in Kittson County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 616
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Kittson County, Minnesota totaled $5,463,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Merle Schwenzfeier | Hallock, MN 56728 | $15,328 |
122 | Gary D Jensen | Drayton, ND 58225 | $15,324 |
123 | Donnie Schmiedeberg | Lancaster, MN 56735 | $15,214 |
124 | Margaret Backstrom | Long Beach, CA 90815 | $15,107 |
125 | Reuben Gorden | Climax, MN 56523 | $14,994 |
126 | David Lind | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $14,901 |
127 | Dennis Winge | Kennedy, MN 56733 | $14,894 |
128 | Floyd Franklin | Dalhart, TX 79022 | $14,875 |
129 | Randy J Osowski | Grafton, ND 58237 | $14,873 |
130 | Chad Lian | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $14,798 |
131 | Daniel Larter | Long Lake, MN 55356 | $14,639 |
132 | Brian Lane | Lake Bronson, MN 56734 | $14,571 |
133 | Larry R Wilebski | Lancaster, MN 56735 | $14,430 |
134 | Rodney Peterson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $14,294 |
135 | Kathryn A Lewis | Plattsburg, MO 64477 | $14,268 |
136 | Hope Scoles | Apple Valley, MN 55124 | $13,974 |
137 | Grant Sang | Karlstad, MN 56732 | $13,912 |
138 | Border Oaks Llp | Lancaster, MN 56735 | $13,815 |
139 | United Valley Bank ** | Hallock, MN 56728 | $13,628 |
140 | Nathan & Michael Olsonawski | Hallock, MN 56728 | $13,453 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”