Conservation Reserve Program in Lac qui Parle County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 678
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Lac qui Parle County, Minnesota totaled $3,077,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Daniel R Armstrong | Dawson, MN 56232 | $7,209 |
122 | Michael D Armstrong | Paynesville, MN 56362 | $7,209 |
123 | Carmen Fernholz | Madison, MN 56256 | $7,172 |
124 | Patricia Walgrave | Madison, MN 56256 | $7,129 |
125 | Jonathon Hegland | Appleton, MN 56208 | $7,108 |
126 | James A Call | Madison, MN 56256 | $7,004 |
127 | Ronald Stafne | Marietta, MN 56257 | $6,976 |
128 | Moen Family Farm LLC | Belle Fourche, SD 57717 | $6,960 |
129 | Douglas Buffington | Marietta, MN 56257 | $6,948 |
130 | Michael V Spors | Bellingham, MN 56212 | $6,888 |
131 | M Keith Larson | Red Wing, MN 55066 | $6,831 |
132 | Bonita L Kittleson Revocable Trust | Sauk Rapids, MN 56379 | $6,793 |
133 | Maren E Bakken | Dawson, MN 56232 | $6,717 |
134 | Trent M Jorgenson | Watson, MN 56295 | $6,616 |
135 | Joseph A Roggenbuck | Nassau, MN 56257 | $6,613 |
136 | Joanne Kay Nelson | Canby, MN 56220 | $6,596 |
137 | Paul Nelson | Canby, MN 56220 | $6,589 |
138 | Matthew J Bormann | Madison, MN 56256 | $6,580 |
139 | Valerius Roggenbuck | Odessa, MN 56276 | $6,534 |
140 | Jerome Kallhoff | Madison, MN 56256 | $6,469 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”