Production Flexibility Program in Lac qui Parle County, Minnesota, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 1,408

Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Lac qui Parle County, Minnesota totaled $32,909,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Production Flexibility Program
1995-2023
141Delton SorensonBellingham, MN 56212$67,307
142Kevin L KemenMadison, MN 56256$67,272
143Kleven Agra IncMilan, MN 56262$66,501
144Gary P NelsonDawson, MN 56232$66,495
145Thomas LudvigsonMadison, MN 56256$66,445
146Martin R GoergerMadison, MN 56256$66,045
147Charles SchellbergBellingham, MN 56212$65,988
148Dennis MoeMadison, MN 56256$65,208
149Wayne C EngerMadison, MN 56256$65,130
150Ronald EngerMadison, MN 56256$65,130
151Bradley J NesvoldMadison, MN 56256$64,998
152David J HaasMadison, MN 56256$64,648
153Gary L MillerDawson, MN 56232$64,635
154Jeffrey ThompsonBoyd, MN 56218$64,598
155Joseph C RadermacherOrtonville, MN 56278$64,270
156Mark A EnevoldsenMontevideo, MN 56265$64,248
157Wayde WeberNew Prague, MN 56071$63,915
158Robert LudvigsonMadison, MN 56256$63,724
159David Jerome ReiffenbergerOdessa, MN 56276$63,486
160Steven J HaasMadison, MN 56256$63,395

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag