Market Loss Assistance Program in Le Sueur County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 792
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Le Sueur County, Minnesota totaled $11,987,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Todd Sullivan | Le Center, MN 56057 | $79,499 |
22 | Patrick T O'connell | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $79,449 |
23 | Tim Tellijohn | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $78,877 |
24 | Douglas Miller | Le Center, MN 56057 | $78,207 |
25 | Mark S Pettis | Kasota, MN 56050 | $76,132 |
26 | Stacey Schulz | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $73,325 |
27 | D & A Meyer Farms | New Prague, MN 56071 | $73,271 |
28 | Paul Dauk | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $72,671 |
29 | Vetter Farms Inc | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $72,401 |
30 | Tim Hermel | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $71,421 |
31 | George Weaver | Waterville, MN 56096 | $71,243 |
32 | Charles Erkel | Le Center, MN 56057 | $70,537 |
33 | Rich Acres Inc | Le Center, MN 56057 | $69,970 |
34 | Chadderdon & Sons Inc | Cleveland, MN 56017 | $68,824 |
35 | Richard James Stangler | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $67,211 |
36 | Paul R Entinger | New Prague, MN 56071 | $66,769 |
37 | Timothy Biehn | Cleveland, MN 56017 | $63,466 |
38 | Distel Farms Inc | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $63,071 |
39 | Schmidt Farms Partnership | Le Center, MN 56057 | $63,004 |
40 | Lone Oak Farm Inc | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $62,440 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”