Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Le Sueur County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 580
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Le Sueur County, Minnesota totaled $2,458,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R & R Farms | New Prague, MN 56071 | $19,311 |
22 | C J Farms Inc | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $18,655 |
23 | Michael A Cemensky | New Prague, MN 56071 | $18,495 |
24 | Lone Oak Farm Inc | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $18,461 |
25 | Meyer Brookside Farms Inc | New Prague, MN 56071 | $18,140 |
26 | Jerome F Mccabe | Le Center, MN 56057 | $17,496 |
27 | David O'brien | New Prague, MN 56071 | $17,242 |
28 | Tiede Grain & Livestock LLC | Le Center, MN 56057 | $17,169 |
29 | B & B Partners | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $17,087 |
30 | Vetter Farms Inc | No Mankato, MN 56003 | $16,411 |
31 | Timothy R O'loughlin | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $16,378 |
32 | Jody Lynn O'loughlin | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $16,378 |
33 | Paul Dauk | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $16,131 |
34 | Tellijohn Farms | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $15,881 |
35 | Dan Sullivan | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $15,679 |
36 | Robert W Zimmerman | Le Center, MN 56057 | $15,448 |
37 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $14,914 |
38 | Bruce Marzahn | Waterville, MN 56096 | $14,785 |
39 | Mark N Koepp | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $13,513 |
40 | James Glisczinski | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $13,303 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”