Farm Subsidy information
Le Sueur County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Le Sueur County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,329
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Le Sueur County, Minnesota totaled $17,633,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dale Berndt | Elysian, MN 56028 | $53,373 |
42 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $52,828 |
43 | Elmer Lambrecht Jr | New Prague, MN 56071 | $51,765 |
44 | Steve Stangler | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $50,514 |
45 | Michael Macho | Le Center, MN 56057 | $49,632 |
46 | Karl R Heldberg | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $49,556 |
47 | Alan Gehrke | Waterville, MN 56096 | $49,007 |
48 | Pikal Family LLC | New Prague, MN 56071 | $48,434 |
49 | Widmer Pork Inc | New Prague, MN 56071 | $47,825 |
50 | Randy Warner | New Prague, MN 56071 | $46,044 |
51 | John E Mcgillen | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $45,484 |
52 | Bruce Marzahn | Waterville, MN 56096 | $45,435 |
53 | William Stangler | Cleveland, MN 56017 | $44,588 |
54 | Dennis Krautkremer | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $44,338 |
55 | Bruce M Koepp | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $44,214 |
56 | David Alan Richter | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $43,928 |
57 | Paul Dauk | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $43,629 |
58 | Francis Rynda | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $43,176 |
59 | Justin J Scheurer | Elysian, MN 56028 | $43,033 |
60 | Dmm Farms LLC | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $42,882 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”