Total Conservation Programs in Le Sueur County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 929
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Le Sueur County, Minnesota totaled $5,320,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Jerome A Miller | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $22,053 |
62 | Dietz Family Farms | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $21,756 |
63 | Le Roy Chard | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $21,051 |
64 | David Pint | New Prague, MN 56071 | $21,045 |
65 | H & M Properties | Annandale, MN 55302 | $20,812 |
66 | Donald N Marzahn Family Trust | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $20,388 |
67 | William A Miller Testamentary Trust | Lino Lakes, MN 55014 | $19,198 |
68 | Leroy F Wolff | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $18,707 |
69 | Mary J Wolff | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $18,707 |
70 | Jerome Kajer | New Prague, MN 56071 | $18,102 |
71 | Danny L Boisen | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $18,061 |
72 | Melvin Wendt | Elysian, MN 56028 | $17,359 |
73 | Jean Wendt | Elysian, MN 56028 | $17,359 |
74 | Jeanette B Korbel | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $17,322 |
75 | Kathy Wesley | Waterville, MN 56096 | $17,269 |
76 | Ronald Weyl | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $17,204 |
77 | Gerald Wintheiser | Wayzata, MN 55391 | $16,984 |
78 | Geoffrey A Iverson | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $16,666 |
79 | Endurance Farms | Green Isle, MN 55338 | $16,630 |
80 | Pikal Family LLC | New Prague, MN 56071 | $16,586 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”