Total Commodity Programs in Le Sueur County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 600
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Le Sueur County, Minnesota totaled $6,519,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Robert W Zimmerman | Le Center, MN 56057 | $29,897 |
62 | Mark N Koepp | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $29,825 |
63 | Michael Macho | Le Center, MN 56057 | $28,360 |
64 | Steven W O'loughlin | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $27,827 |
65 | Lone Oak Farm Inc | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $27,717 |
66 | David G Novotny | Le Center, MN 56057 | $27,659 |
67 | Bruce M Koepp | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $26,913 |
68 | Loss Lake Farms Inc | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $26,865 |
69 | Darvin Reddemann | Le Center, MN 56057 | $26,830 |
70 | Richard A Rynda | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $26,675 |
71 | Prairie Hogs Inc | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $26,265 |
72 | Edward F Halloran | Le Center, MN 56057 | $26,085 |
73 | Brian Eppmeyer | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $26,055 |
74 | Joseph G Kienlen | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $24,944 |
75 | James Glisczinski | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $24,914 |
76 | Dan Sullivan | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $24,498 |
77 | Dale Tiede | Le Center, MN 56057 | $24,296 |
78 | Mark W Phillips | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $23,999 |
79 | Jon D Schabert | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $23,977 |
80 | Roger Weiers | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $23,781 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”