Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Le Sueur County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 580
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Le Sueur County, Minnesota totaled $2,458,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Donald Quiram | Waterville, MN 56096 | $8,845 |
82 | Melissa Schwartz | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $8,662 |
83 | Terry Schwartz | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $8,662 |
84 | Loren Stauff | Cleveland, MN 56017 | $8,576 |
85 | Ruhland Farms | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $8,510 |
86 | Michael A O'connell | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $8,356 |
87 | Hollerich Family Farms LLC | Cleveland, MN 56017 | $8,331 |
88 | Robert Choudek | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $8,302 |
89 | Brian Entinger | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $8,279 |
90 | Steven P Gostomczik | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $8,071 |
91 | Robert J Culhane | Waterville, MN 56096 | $8,030 |
92 | Bruce M Koepp | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $8,002 |
93 | Alan Gehrke | Waterville, MN 56096 | $7,944 |
94 | John Meierbachtol | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $7,933 |
95 | Alan & Barb Schwartz Farms Inc | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $7,889 |
96 | Wayne James | Elysian, MN 56028 | $7,842 |
97 | Curtis Bohlen | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $7,812 |
98 | Tom Binczik | Le Center, MN 56057 | $7,736 |
99 | Kevin J Meyer | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $7,408 |
100 | Nathan J Krenik | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $7,388 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”