Total Conservation Programs in Le Sueur County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 929
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Le Sueur County, Minnesota totaled $5,320,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Eleanore Storjohann | Janesville, MN 56048 | $16,306 |
82 | O'briens Lake Emily Farm Inc | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $16,296 |
83 | Jeffrey B Gibbs | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $16,268 |
84 | Joann Kortuem | Madison Lake, MN 56063 | $16,059 |
85 | Timothy O Rinehart First Complete And Superseding | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $15,902 |
86 | Craig Eggers | Excelsior, MN 55331 | $15,884 |
87 | John Eggers | Bemidji, MN 56601 | $15,884 |
88 | Gary Felmlee | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $15,595 |
89 | Anna M Mentjes | Le Center, MN 56057 | $15,575 |
90 | Eldon Stavenau | Elysian, MN 56028 | $15,481 |
91 | Dorothy M Knish | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $15,138 |
92 | Gene Krautkremer | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $15,007 |
93 | Wayne Zuelch | Le Center, MN 56057 | $14,883 |
94 | Scott Collier | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $14,874 |
95 | Edward W Strobel III | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $14,674 |
96 | Francis Burg | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $14,447 |
97 | Bruce Stasney | New Prague, MN 56071 | $14,226 |
98 | Janice Eggers | Excelsior, MN 55331 | $14,060 |
99 | Harcath Inc | Le Sueur, MN 56058 | $14,048 |
100 | Faye Maxine Radanke | Prior Lake, MN 55372 | $13,995 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”