Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Le Sueur County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 580
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Le Sueur County, Minnesota totaled $2,458,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Richard Raymond Breeggemann | Shakopee, MN 55379 | $6,155 |
122 | Ruhland Family Farms LLC | New Prague, MN 56071 | $6,154 |
123 | Matthew L Stauff | Cleveland, MN 56017 | $6,113 |
124 | Kurt R Gostomczik | Kasota, MN 56050 | $6,102 |
125 | Rich Acres Inc | Le Center, MN 56057 | $5,780 |
126 | Jerome C Widmer | New Prague, MN 56071 | $5,762 |
127 | Widmer Pork Inc | New Prague, MN 56071 | $5,749 |
128 | Kenneth Pomije | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $5,734 |
129 | John E Mcgillen | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $5,714 |
130 | Cletus C & Dennis G Gregor Partnership | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $5,578 |
131 | Bisek Brothers Inc | New Prague, MN 56071 | $5,546 |
132 | Richard James Stangler | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $5,503 |
133 | Steven Duane Schultz | Saint Peter, MN 56082 | $5,474 |
134 | Eric R Muellerleile | Elysian, MN 56028 | $5,468 |
135 | Robert Nytes | New Prague, MN 56071 | $5,383 |
136 | Daniel Solheid | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $5,376 |
137 | Joyce Holicky | Le Center, MN 56057 | $5,221 |
138 | James Balfe | Kilkenny, MN 56052 | $5,207 |
139 | Steve J Jindra | Montgomery, MN 56069 | $5,129 |
140 | Koepp Hog Farms LLC | Belle Plaine, MN 56011 | $5,119 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”