Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Lincoln County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 141
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Lincoln County, Minnesota totaled $326,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Christopher J Blanchette | Canby, MN 56220 | $2,131 |
42 | Jeff Hulstein | Chandler, MN 56122 | $2,067 |
43 | Paula Sterzinger | Taunton, MN 56291 | $2,055 |
44 | Keith Olsen | Canby, MN 56220 | $1,938 |
45 | Luke W Nibbe | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $1,932 |
46 | Nathan Krog | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $1,932 |
47 | Brian Joseph Rybinski | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $1,920 |
48 | Scott E Hiniker | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $1,893 |
49 | Mark Lacek | Canby, MN 56220 | $1,881 |
50 | , | $1,872 | |
51 | Lucas J Moorse | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $1,809 |
52 | , | $1,803 | |
53 | William Grenz | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $1,797 |
54 | J & K Rupp Farm Inc | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $1,776 |
55 | Mitchell Joseph Pederson | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $1,734 |
56 | Michael John Fruechte | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $1,716 |
57 | Dan D Deutz | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $1,650 |
58 | Jared Rouge | Tyler, MN 56178 | $1,635 |
59 | Jeffrey J Kirk | Tyler, MN 56178 | $1,608 |
60 | Thomas Rock Fier | Minneota, MN 56264 | $1,590 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”