Farm Subsidy information
Lincoln County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Lincoln County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,103
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lincoln County, Minnesota totaled $20,298,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fierview Dairy | Taunton, MN 56291 | $185,767 |
| 2 | Roger W Peters | Tyler, MN 56178 | $143,133 |
| 3 | Randy Hauschild | Porter, MN 56280 | $129,348 |
| 4 | Ash Grove Dairy, Llp | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $121,548 |
| 5 | Chad Olsen | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $116,678 |
| 6 | Pamela Olsen | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $110,467 |
| 7 | Paul Sterzinger | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $98,478 |
| 8 | Richland Farms Partnership | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $95,968 |
| 9 | Kremer Farms Partnership | Iona, MN 56141 | $94,548 |
| 10 | Kevin L Rybinski | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $94,285 |
| 11 | S & J Farms Inc | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $90,457 |
| 12 | Andrew P Jensen | Tyler, MN 56178 | $89,605 |
| 13 | Adam J Popowski | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $84,794 |
| 14 | Renkly Farms Inc | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $83,841 |
| 15 | Randy Janiszeski | Porter, MN 56280 | $81,182 |
| 16 | L & B Olsen Farms Inc | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $80,572 |
| 17 | Weber Farms Inc | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $76,944 |
| 18 | Steven Mark Hesse | Tyler, MN 56178 | $71,389 |
| 19 | John Jerzak | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $71,058 |
| 20 | Timothy Thooft | Tyler, MN 56178 | $68,349 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf