Total Conservation Programs in Mahnomen County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 146
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mahnomen County, Minnesota totaled $755,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John Pavlish | East Grand Forks, MN 56721 | $4,976 |
42 | Deljoan Revier | Waubun, MN 56589 | $4,953 |
43 | Duane -duane H. Dittmer Trust Dated Octo Dittmer | Billings, MT 59105 | $4,907 |
44 | Wayne Benson | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $4,895 |
45 | Roger Francis | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $4,874 |
46 | David - Mccollum Revocable Trust A Mccollum | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $4,702 |
47 | Michele Schoenborn | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $4,695 |
48 | Allan Leff | Waubun, MN 56589 | $4,477 |
49 | Saint Pierre Properties LLC | Golden Valley, MN 55427 | $4,375 |
50 | Charlotte J Bakken | New Ipswich, NH 03071 | $4,284 |
51 | Rose Anne Schlick | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,997 |
52 | Elroy Hanson | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,847 |
53 | Steven Faldet | Mcintosh, MN 56556 | $3,790 |
54 | Ma & Pa Nesvold Property | Fosston, MN 56542 | $3,652 |
55 | Dale Noll | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,560 |
56 | Marvin Staska | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,473 |
57 | David Eiynck | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,200 |
58 | Duane R Swiers | Bejou, MN 56516 | $3,171 |
59 | Gary Erichson | Mahtomedi, MN 55115 | $3,121 |
60 | Diane Erichson | Mahtomedi, MN 55115 | $3,121 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”