Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Mahnomen County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 160
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Mahnomen County, Minnesota totaled $1,836,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Duane R Pavlish | Fosston, MN 56542 | $4,095 |
102 | Jason Teiken | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $4,093 |
103 | Daniel P Mcnamee | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $4,083 |
104 | Nathan Sweep | Fosston, MN 56542 | $3,992 |
105 | Craig Burrack | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,992 |
106 | Dylan Conrad Larson | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,958 |
107 | Kyle M Dormanen | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,920 |
108 | Kemper Farms LLC | Waubun, MN 56589 | $3,823 |
109 | Peter Revier | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,797 |
110 | Kelly J Syverson | Twin Valley, MN 56584 | $3,628 |
111 | Roger Hextell | Lengby, MN 56651 | $3,545 |
112 | William Bly | Waubun, MN 56589 | $3,490 |
113 | Mrs Jessica Marie Fauchald | Lengby, MN 56651 | $3,385 |
114 | Jerome Slette | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,337 |
115 | Joseph M Pantaleo | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,246 |
116 | Benjamin Douglas Kettner | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $3,207 |
117 | Gene Scott | Lengby, MN 56651 | $2,926 |
118 | Mark Simonson | Mcintosh, MN 56556 | $2,870 |
119 | Logan Handyside | Lengby, MN 56651 | $2,725 |
120 | John Neisen | Mahnomen, MN 56557 | $2,641 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”