Total Conservation Programs in Marshall County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 689
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Marshall County, Minnesota totaled $5,514,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Rosanne Nelson | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $37,700 |
22 | Floyd L Anderson | Bemidji, MN 56601 | $35,559 |
23 | John S Frahm | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $35,510 |
24 | Boen Farms | Strandquist, MN 56758 | $35,392 |
25 | , | $35,027 | |
26 | Melissa Muzzy | Ames, IA 50010 | $34,424 |
27 | Scott Peters | Viking, MN 56760 | $34,135 |
28 | Renee Ann Stennes | New River, AZ 85087 | $33,744 |
29 | Richard A Olson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $32,914 |
30 | Norman J Lindemoen | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $32,764 |
31 | Barbara Ann Rodahl | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $32,374 |
32 | Willis A Johnson | Mesa, AZ 85215 | $31,276 |
33 | Rodahl Farms Inc | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $31,190 |
34 | Patricia Anderson | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $31,156 |
35 | Jason Anderson | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $31,156 |
36 | Rambu Inc Of Goodridge | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $31,016 |
37 | Kenneth Cwikla | Middle River, MN 56737 | $30,946 |
38 | Darlene Roseland | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $30,821 |
39 | David Thompson | Middle River, MN 56737 | $28,879 |
40 | Colleen Ness | Strathcona, MN 56759 | $28,264 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”