Farm Subsidy information
Marshall County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Marshall County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 863
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marshall County, Minnesota totaled $39,896,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Boen Farms | Strandquist, MN 56758 | $35,392 |
62 | Melissa Muzzy | Ames, IA 50010 | $34,424 |
63 | Kody D Pierce | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $34,394 |
64 | Rosanne Nelson | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $34,281 |
65 | Richard A Olson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $32,914 |
66 | Evert Langelett | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $32,741 |
67 | Barbara Ann Rodahl | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $32,374 |
68 | Rodahl Farms Inc | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $31,190 |
69 | Patricia Anderson | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $31,156 |
70 | Jason Anderson | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $31,156 |
71 | Kyle J Pierce | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $30,868 |
72 | J & S Nelson Farms Llp | East Grand Forks, MN 56721 | $30,215 |
73 | Arnold - Maurstad Revocable Living Trust P Maursta | Argyle, MN 56713 | $29,313 |
74 | David Thompson | Middle River, MN 56737 | $28,879 |
75 | Colleen Ness | Strathcona, MN 56759 | $28,264 |
76 | Bremer Bank ** | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $28,235 |
77 | Terry Beich | East Grand Forks, MN 56721 | $28,070 |
78 | Donn A Anderson | Stephen, MN 56757 | $27,669 |
79 | Gregory E Anderson | Warroad, MN 56763 | $27,529 |
80 | Knoll Brothers | Warren, MN 56762 | $27,002 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”