Conservation Reserve Program in Marshall County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 643
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Marshall County, Minnesota totaled $5,843,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Kevin Wiek | Princeton, MN 55371 | $20,340 |
82 | Paul Jeremy Vigen | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $20,273 |
83 | Einer A Langelett | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $20,264 |
84 | Kurtis Morenz | Anaheim, CA 92807 | $20,221 |
85 | Joey L Potucek | Warren, MN 56762 | $20,089 |
86 | , | $20,026 | |
87 | Donna M Nelson-arneson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $20,002 |
88 | Leland R Nelson | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $19,996 |
89 | Steven J Olson | Bloomington, MN 55420 | $19,741 |
90 | Brandon C Morenz | Orange, CA 92869 | $19,638 |
91 | Gary Toren | Alvarado, MN 56710 | $19,591 |
92 | Tad D Wikstrom | Lino Lakes, MN 55014 | $19,515 |
93 | Joseph B Efta | Argyle, MN 56713 | $19,468 |
94 | Florian Dittrich | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $19,453 |
95 | Jeffrey W Pederson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $19,257 |
96 | Dean Allen Peterson | Middle River, MN 56737 | $18,974 |
97 | Darrel T Johnson | Inver Grove, MN 55076 | $18,452 |
98 | Nathan Wozniak | Warren, MN 56762 | $18,181 |
99 | Russell Kapping | Warren, MN 56762 | $18,008 |
100 | Rodney D Liedberg | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $17,937 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”