Emergency Conservation Program in Marshall County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 138
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Marshall County, Minnesota totaled $412,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Weldon Mcfarland | East Grand Forks, MN 56721 | $472 |
102 | Potucek Farms Inc | Warren, MN 56762 | $467 |
103 | Leo Osowski | Oslo, MN 56744 | $448 |
104 | James L Gowan Jr | Queen Creek, AZ 85143 | $419 |
105 | Randy Olson | Oslo, MN 56744 | $371 |
106 | Anton Gryskiewicz | Thompson, ND 58278 | $361 |
107 | Gail Steinhauer | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $346 |
108 | Tommy Steinhauer | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $345 |
109 | Roger D Anderson | Viking, MN 56760 | $320 |
110 | Thad Bajdek | Stephen, MN 56757 | $312 |
111 | Demur Farms Inc | Kennedy, MN 56733 | $307 |
112 | John S Osowski | Oslo, MN 56744 | $301 |
113 | Raymond T Rapacz | Argyle, MN 56713 | $293 |
114 | Kevin L Yutrzenka | Breezy Point, MN 56472 | $289 |
115 | Ruth Elseth | Warren, MN 56762 | $270 |
116 | Alen Szczepanski | Argyle, MN 56713 | $269 |
117 | Arnold Kostrzewski | Stephen, MN 56757 | $266 |
118 | Donald Capistran | Roosevelt, MN 56673 | $241 |
119 | Daryl Capistran | Minneapolis, MN 55409 | $241 |
120 | Diane Devine | Plymouth, MN 55442 | $241 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”