Farm Subsidy information
Marshall County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Marshall County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 863
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Marshall County, Minnesota totaled $39,896,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Jon O Fosholm | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $21,897 |
102 | Allan Zak | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $21,768 |
103 | Bernard Blawat | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $21,406 |
104 | David Pietruszewski | Karlstad, MN 56732 | $21,401 |
105 | Dale Newton | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $21,087 |
106 | Potucek Farms Inc | Warren, MN 56762 | $21,087 |
107 | Zachary C Green | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $21,011 |
108 | United Grain & Livestock Inc | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $20,835 |
109 | Samuel L Grandstrand | Stephen, MN 56757 | $20,818 |
110 | Amy Louise Loven | Bemidji, MN 56601 | $20,638 |
111 | Lynn C Sundby | Argyle, MN 56713 | $20,604 |
112 | , | $20,379 | |
113 | , | $20,352 | |
114 | Kevin Wiek | Princeton, MN 55371 | $20,340 |
115 | Paul Jeremy Vigen | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $20,273 |
116 | Einer A Langelett | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $20,264 |
117 | Kurtis Morenz | Anaheim, CA 92807 | $20,221 |
118 | Joey L Potucek | Warren, MN 56762 | $20,089 |
119 | , | $20,026 | |
120 | Donna M Nelson-arneson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $20,002 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”