Farm Subsidy information
Martin County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Martin County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 473
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Martin County, Minnesota totaled $10,968,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | South View Acres Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $18,655 |
42 | James J Kluver | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $18,288 |
43 | Lily Creek Farm Inc | Welcome, MN 56181 | $18,223 |
44 | Sandra Larson | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $18,208 |
45 | Bacon Acres Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $17,939 |
46 | Palmer M Welcome | New Prague, MN 56071 | $17,612 |
47 | Chase Crawford | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $17,312 |
48 | Robert H Smith | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $16,903 |
49 | Gerald Meyer | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $16,862 |
50 | , | $16,862 | |
51 | Darin Hagen | Ceylon, MN 56121 | $16,572 |
52 | Randy Grathwohl | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $15,710 |
53 | Trudy Bates Rev Living Trust 6/28/06 | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $15,556 |
54 | Hoovel Properties Inc | Geneva, IL 60134 | $15,420 |
55 | Mark S Grefe | Truman, MN 56088 | $15,398 |
56 | Steven Saggau | Ceylon, MN 56121 | $14,862 |
57 | Sarah Jagodzinske Rohman | Welcome, MN 56181 | $14,834 |
58 | Dean E Weiss | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $14,686 |
59 | Katelyn Ruth Ufer | Truman, MN 56088 | $14,648 |
60 | Bruce Eisenmenger | Welcome, MN 56181 | $14,406 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”