Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Martin County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 600
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Martin County, Minnesota totaled $19,380,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $750,000 |
2 | North Ridge Horizons Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $750,000 |
3 | Schwieger Hogs Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $750,000 |
4 | Signature Swine Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $511,130 |
5 | Windmill Farm Usa Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $503,104 |
6 | First Farmers & Merchants Bank ** | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $480,588 |
7 | Lbh Partners Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $467,147 |
8 | Bentdale Farms Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $274,492 |
9 | Wolter Brothers | Granada, MN 56039 | $252,093 |
10 | Foul-air Acres Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $250,000 |
11 | Center Creek Pork Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $250,000 |
12 | Demand Pork Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $250,000 |
13 | Snooters Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $250,000 |
14 | Jeffrey Moeller | Welcome, MN 56181 | $244,694 |
15 | Triple F Cattle & Grain LLC | Trimont, MN 56176 | $229,728 |
16 | Unke Pork Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $226,795 |
17 | Bicknase Farms LLC | Welcome, MN 56181 | $216,611 |
18 | Terry Roemen | Ceylon, MN 56121 | $209,505 |
19 | Steven H Meyer | Welcome, MN 56181 | $208,253 |
20 | Wings Up Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $204,333 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>