Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Martin County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 698
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Martin County, Minnesota totaled $30,555,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $750,000 |
2 | Schwieger Hogs Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $750,000 |
3 | North Ridge Horizons Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $741,988 |
4 | Ba Operations LLC | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $500,000 |
5 | Sanders Farms | Truman, MN 56088 | $440,717 |
6 | Windmill Farm Usa Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $412,367 |
7 | Community Bank Mankato ** | Amboy, MN 56010 | $387,361 |
8 | Lbh Partners Llp | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $375,000 |
9 | Bentdale Farms Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $372,648 |
10 | Truesdell Family Farm Partnership | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $344,033 |
11 | Maday Family Farms | Granada, MN 56039 | $264,466 |
12 | Foul-air Acres Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $250,000 |
13 | 1892 Farms Llp | Truman, MN 56088 | $250,000 |
14 | Unke Pork Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $238,000 |
15 | Roger L Matejka | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $221,719 |
16 | Wolter Brothers | Granada, MN 56039 | $204,865 |
17 | Signature Swine Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $190,240 |
18 | Grow More Pork LLC | Welcome, MN 56181 | $189,461 |
19 | Steven H Meyer | Welcome, MN 56181 | $187,789 |
20 | Stone Lake Farm Inc | Trimont, MN 56176 | $186,826 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>