Farm Subsidy information
Martin County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Martin County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,023
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Martin County, Minnesota totaled $37,309,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $943,350 |
| 2 | Sanders Farms | Truman, MN 56088 | $586,470 |
| 3 | Cory & Layne Ebeling Partnership | Trimont, MN 56176 | $417,615 |
| 4 | Maday Family Farms | Granada, MN 56039 | $381,599 |
| 5 | Truesdell Family Farm Partnership | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $320,052 |
| 6 | Moore Grain Inc | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $300,037 |
| 7 | Bentdale Farms Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $294,249 |
| 8 | Sjs Farms | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $285,045 |
| 9 | Stone Lake Farm Inc | Trimont, MN 56176 | $284,573 |
| 10 | Faber Bros Farm | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $231,794 |
| 11 | Randy Nelson Farms Inc | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $221,593 |
| 12 | Lily Creek Farm Inc | Welcome, MN 56181 | $218,205 |
| 13 | Brockmann Bros | Granada, MN 56039 | $210,828 |
| 14 | Esb Farm Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $205,929 |
| 15 | David Burk | Amboy, MN 56010 | $204,488 |
| 16 | Wolter Brothers | Granada, MN 56039 | $187,930 |
| 17 | Calvin And Jody Saxton Family Partnership | Granada, MN 56039 | $184,873 |
| 18 | Ufer Farms Partnership | Truman, MN 56088 | $170,188 |
| 19 | Tony Weihe | Truman, MN 56088 | $156,500 |
| 20 | Helvig Farms Inc | Truman, MN 56088 | $155,159 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf